Why We Care.
Drew is innocent. He did not commit murder. It was self defense. He was trying to defend himself from attack by a pack of drunken, aggressive UC Berkeley frat boys.
Why Is Justice 4 Drew Important?
In America, there should be "equal justice". We are all legally allowed to protect ourselves. A pack of UC frat boys should not be given special status and permitted to attack people in the streets. Frats do not control the public sidewalk. A pack of black boys or Hispanic boys are called gangs and subject to severe punishment.
Drew should not be punished for defending himself. We support Drew because he was wrongfully convicted.
Drew is now in Sierra Conservation Center Please write him:
Andrew Hoeft-Edenfield
Sierra Conservation Center State Prison
CDC# AD5648
3C-249-L
5150 O'Byrnes Ferry Road
Jamestown, CA 95327
What Happened?
Drew's Conviction Was Unjust and Wrong.
On May 3, 2008, Drew and his friend Adam were attacked and beaten in a dark parking lot. A CT Scan taken of Drew's brain showed unequivocally that Drew had brain swelling from being kicked and hit in the head. His body showed kick marks, scrapes, and clear signs of attack.
Members of Sigma Pi admitted that there were 10-12 people against Drew and his one friend Adam. The uncontradicted testimony was that the parking lot was crowded and many people were fighting. If 10-12 people are all on one side, it's clear that it was 12 against 2.
California law permits anyone to defend himself from attack. Self-defense is not murder. The judge prevented the jury from hearing all the evidence of Drew's attacker's history of drunken violence
Drew's conviction of 2nd degree murder is unjust and wrong.
Read more What happened the night of May 3, 2008.
Why wasn't this murder. The trial was a fraud on the jury.
The court kept important evidence from the jury.
The Court's actions helped the prosecutor convict.
The judge steered the jury to a murder conviction.
The DA conducted a steady campaign of character smears.
The Berkeley Police and the Alameda District Attorney treat frats with favoritism.
The Berkeley police participated in a cover-up.
Memo to the Berkeley Police.
UC Frats Out of Control and Being Sued By Neighbors
On May 3, 2008, Drew and his friend Adam were attacked and beaten in a dark parking lot. A CT Scan taken of Drew's brain showed unequivocally that Drew had brain swelling from being kicked and hit in the head. His body showed kick marks, scrapes, and clear signs of attack.
Members of Sigma Pi admitted that there were 10-12 people against Drew and his one friend Adam. The uncontradicted testimony was that the parking lot was crowded and many people were fighting. If 10-12 people are all on one side, it's clear that it was 12 against 2.
California law permits anyone to defend himself from attack. Self-defense is not murder. The judge prevented the jury from hearing all the evidence of Drew's attacker's history of drunken violence
Drew's conviction of 2nd degree murder is unjust and wrong.
Read more What happened the night of May 3, 2008.
Why wasn't this murder. The trial was a fraud on the jury.
The court kept important evidence from the jury.
The Court's actions helped the prosecutor convict.
The judge steered the jury to a murder conviction.
The DA conducted a steady campaign of character smears.
The Berkeley Police and the Alameda District Attorney treat frats with favoritism.
The Berkeley police participated in a cover-up.
Memo to the Berkeley Police.
UC Frats Out of Control and Being Sued By Neighbors
